15 May 2023, 08:33

Hey guys, I'd love some takes on this as it occasionally comes up when I work with private clients.

I work with quite a few people that intent to self-publish as the workload and pay have turned out to be quite rewarding for me. Generally, my terms state that their rights only allow them to print and distribute the book themselves, and I want input if a third party, such as a publisher, was to ever be involved.

There are those authors that don't aim to self publish but actually do want to approach a publisher with their book once it's illustrated. I have always advised against that because from my understanding, publishers often like to choose their own illustrators and want more input on the project. On top of that, of course, I don't like to let my illustrations go to a publisher with potentially much greater budget without retaining the rights to negotiate on that point.

But I'm curious now if I am actually right about that, or if anyone has different opinions in how to best advise prospective authors. Basically, I don't want them to waste money on illustrating a project that might not require illustrations yet if they're inquiring with publishers, lest all those illustrations end up falling to the wayside anyway.

I know author-illustrator combos are a different affair as publishers might like to work with one person for both, but where the author has just paid for illustrations as a done deal, is this happily scene by publishers?

Generally I offer these authors to illustrate a dummy book so they can show their idea for the book without setting everything in stone or paying too much upfront.

What do you guys think about that?