Website Feedback

[Griffin McPherson]

@Melissa_Bailey I think all the pieces currently in there look great. I don’t think there’s any reason to whittle it down to 15. I think removing pieces that aren’t up to snuff with the rest is more import than having a small portfolio for the sake of having a small portfolio. I’ve heard so many differences numbers for how many pieces to have in a portfolio from 10 to 22. I think it really comes down to the quality rather than the quantity

[Kim Rosenlof]

@Melissa_Bailey I think it looks really good. I the simplicity of the site and it is easy to find everything. I like all the illustrations, but the Alice in Wonderland does look a little duller in colors than some of the others, but I still like it, so it's hard to say to take it out, especially if you are wanting more work with chapter books. I also think that the mouse and leaf picture is not as strong as some of your other ones either, although it is cute. Great job whittling down the amount. I think that is the hardest thing for me to do to my portfolio because I have over 20 .

[Melissa_Bailey]

@Kim-Rosenlof thanks! Yes! Whittling it down is so difficult. And after looking at my portfolio for so long, it's hard to judge which pieces are strong and which are weaker. They all start to look ho-hum to me. But that might be because I'm also dealing with a little imposter syndrome at the moment!

[Melissa_Bailey]

@Griffin-McPherson Thanks for the vote of confidence! Getting all this feedback is great because I really am looking for quality over quantity. I read an article by Molly Idle about how she organizes her portfolio, and she usually only includes 12 to 13 pieces. If a Caldecott winner is that ruthless in excising the weaker pieces, I guess I can be too!

[Miriam]

I would move the one with the "red riding hood" girl with the mice & acorns up to the top next to the pictures with the moles, since they are more similar in style, and it transitions better to the images with humans.

I like the 2nd row as-is, since they have a similar feel & style.

I think the giraffe one would be better grouped with the tiger & poodle images.

I would cut out the mouse flying on the leaf, since it lacks an interesting composition. And maybe the Alice in Wonderland..

I'd also prefer to the see spot images (white backgrounds) grouped together, & the full page images grouped together. So I would put the Kangaroo kid next to the girl with the duck.

It would be nice to have a 3rd wombat illustration. (I don't know whether that's good practices or recommended or not, but it just seems pleasing to me, especially since your layout would fit a row of three images.) But if you don't have a 3rd wombat, I would put the dog with the cookies on that row, after the wombats.

The two with the wombat character are my favorite of all the illustrations. It's really cute.

[Griffin McPherson]

@Melissa_Bailey actually I think it makes more sense to go the opposite direction. I think a Caldecott winner can afford to have very few pieces because they don’t need as many pieces to convey their ability but for those who aren’t at Caldecott level I think it makes sense to have more articles as long as it’s high quality

[geekinm]

I think the website looks great. I love your dog - I have one that looks very similar and he would love to sit on the desk too! He’ll jump up on to my lap when he thinks I’ve done enough painting.

[Melissa_Bailey]

@geekinm Thanks! Your dog sounds like such a character!

[Mewie]

Your art is inspiring and lovely. To echo what others have said already, your website portfolio is CLEAN and shows a great variety and range of your subject matter.

The only thing I would personally change, as others mentioned, is either separating the two mole illustrations (or removing one). I find that they don't contrast and "look more of the same." Also can be said of the 8th/9th illustrations with the green shirted creature (it's not a koala bear... is it a possum?) - If you're looking to cut down your number of images, one of those would be my suggestion.

With that said, I found scrolling through your portfolio very enjoyable. Excited for you!

[Melissa_Bailey]

Thank you, everyone, for the awesome feedback! I've updated my portfolio, if you want to take a look.
mbaileyart.com

[glenfx]

@Melissa_Bailey I really love the pug with the cookie, great work overall.
I tried the instagram link at the bottom of your site since I scrolled down and saw the links there and it goes to squarespace's instagram, and the email next to it goes to an example address so you may need to change those to avoid confusion.

[Melissa_Bailey]

@glenfx thanks! Oh my goodness, I've had SO much trouble with that Instagram link! It keeps unlinking. I relinked it only a few days ago and now it's unlinked again...

[StudioLooong]

Your portfolio is wonderful, love the art and the format of your site. One small thing worth adding would be to have your email written out somewhere on your contact page. I find that most editors/art directors/etc. who've contacted me through my website prefer not to use the form. You can write it out like "email [at] url [dot] com" if you don't want to get spam from bots. On my site mine's listed as studiolooong[at]gmail[dot]com and I've never had problems.

[Melissa_Bailey]

@StudioLooong Thanks! And thanks for the suggestion!