HELP NEEDED CHOOSING BEST PORTFOLIO LAYOUT

Melissa_Bailey

My vote is for option 1, too.

Why? It's easy to navigate and we get to see who you are as an illustrator right away without extra clicks.

Will the thumbnails in the gallery be able to be enlarged? If so, that allows the viewer to choose which image they want to look more closely at. That would be something busy art directors would appreciate.

ambria

@Nyrryl-Cadiz I prefer Option 2 because for me, Option 1 is a bit too cluttered and overwhelming. Option 2 is more organized and put together. It does take more clicking, but I think overall, it's a better look. Great job on your website!

Matthew Oberdier

Option 2 , really impressive to see your work grouped into books.

idid

I like option 2, and for each project, if there are illustrations that look a bit like each other in appearance, such as the second the third image of the Gingerbread Man project, maybe you only need to show one of them. Having three-five images for each project would be a good number.

Neha Rawat

@Nyrryl-Cadiz I'd pick Option 1.
As a client, my priority would like to see the variety and quality of work. Not how many paid/unpaid projects you've completed. If I like your work, I wouldn't mind clicking on the "Work" tab to check who you've worked with.
But in option 1, your first 7 images are all of the same project. Maybe just pick best 2 for each project so that the content doesn't seem repetitive on the home page and shuffle them up. Even with this gallery view, the viewer would probably just see the top 6 images and then have to scroll down. Pick these top images wisely to show your work. Good luck!

Jeremy Ross

Hi @Nyrryl-Cadiz, I’m in the Option 1 camp!

Make it easier for the busy art director.

carlianne

@Neha-Rawat oh great point Neha! It makes the portfolio feel less rounded as well seeing so many similar images right at the top

Nyrryl Cadiz

@Kevin-Treaccar @NessIllustration @Melissa-Bailey-0 @ambria @Matthew-Oberdier @idid @Neha-Rawat @Jeremy-Ross @Jeremy-Ross @carlianne Thank you so much for the input everyone. You've sold me with Option 1. It's an oldie but definitely a goodie. Again, thank you!

Here's my portfolio https://nyrrylcadiz.com/

it's not finished. there's still a lot of this to arrange and buttons to link. Maybe it will be ready by next week.

Nyrryl Cadiz

@idid @Neha-Rawat @carlianne Oh no, my current gallery is no where final or intentional. the only reason the Gingerbread illustrations are on top is because I uploaded them first completely by chance. I prefer showing my strongest piece first (which is my mermaid and other personal work imo). The gingerbread pieces will probably be placed in the center as filler. Tho I agree that limiting the number of illustrations per project will lessen the redundancy. I'll keep that in mind. Thank you!

K.Flagg

@Nyrryl-Cadiz I am also a fan of option 1 . The first layout where you get a quick view of all of your beautiful would be more impactful to art directors I think.

Nyrryl Cadiz

@K-Flagg @christaelrod thank you!

Fey Realme

@ambria personally I agree, #2 feels more clean. If you could change option 1 up a bit, bigger pictures, more spacing, and maybe having project title separations as you scroll down you could convince me.

another option. what if your second and third pictures for option 2 were the home page. I think it would be the best solution. you show a lot of your work from the start, but it is still clearly organized, and interested people could learn more about the projects they like without having to scroll through everything... good luck

burvantill

I'm late to the party. I like version 1 as well. I agree with the statement to choose the best pieces from a project and only show those in the initial page since you have a projects page where the rest could be seen.

Nyrryl Cadiz

hello, everyone! so I've finalized my website.

Here's the link https://nyrrylcadiz.com/home

@R-Fey-Realme @burvantill Thank you so much for the input guys!!!!

carlianne

@Nyrryl-Cadiz Not sure if it's just me, but the art styles don't seem that different. If you were going to break it up I would do "comics" and "illustration" at most, but I don't know that you have to

burvantill

@carlianne @Nyrryl-Cadiz I agree.

Nyrryl Cadiz

@carlianne oh i totally agree. the only difference between Style 1 and 2 is the outline in my opinion. But in my experience, ADs are so specific that they can drop you in the running if you don’t have the specific look they’re going for. I want to get into MG so I need to mimic that mainstream look a bit which means adding linework despite practically drawing the same still.

I had a potential Publisher client before who showed me one of my old pieces with outlines. I didn’t know that they wanted the drawing style but not necessarily the line work. I should’ve asked more questions but I just went with the piece they showed me. I gave them a sample with line work and needless to say, I did not get the job.

If I had separated the 2 styles then they could’ve easily said “We want the Style 1” or “We want style 2.” We could’ve avoided a huge misunderstanding. I don’t want to repeat that again.

carlianne

@Nyrryl-Cadiz that’s very interesting, did they say that was the reason why they dropped you?

Nyrryl Cadiz

@carlianne yup, it was something like my sample not matching the style they were expecting. In hindsight, i should’ve asked for more clarification when they pointed out the said pieces from my portfolio. I should’ve asked what they specifically liked about that piece instead of assuming they wanted the exact same style.

They also pointed out pieces without outlines. I was confused back then but looking back at it now, i kinda understand what they meant.