How are all of you staying creative with the looming threat of AI?
-
@kirsten-mcg I wouldn’t be surprised if you end up being right. That’s what I got into with my illustration work. Long story short: I’ve been drawing comics about stuttering featuring a fox character I created. I was asked at one point to give a cartooning class to kids at a stuttering conference. Then returned year after year. And that grew into an area of interest for me
So yes, a few jobs will be lost as others have already mentioned, however, we still have lots of room to think further outside the box.
-
@NessIllustration This is very much my argument for those illustrators who have already thrown in the (metaphorical) towel and started looking at other careers.
An Ai machine using a dataset of images from 70+ years ago will be very different than one using images made a few hours ago.
-
@NessIllustration If they were to build an AI like this I would probably even use it! Think of how much time it could save when you need a reference of something just to be able to type in what you are looking for and get the reference you need with just a few clicks. I think a tool like this could be a huge help to artists without being a threat to them.
-
@Jean-Watson I'm reminded of a silicon valley quote attributed to (I think) Zuckerberg "Move fast and break things"
And things are certainly cracking -- I don't think broken yet -- but the arts community needs to move even faster.
The question that should be raised was it willful? I would argue that it was. That these companies knew and understood exactly what they were doing. They hoped that no one would notice until it was too late.
-
If you can afford anything for the Concept Art Association Washington DC lobbying efforts that's great.
But raising awareness is just as vital! Theres a ton of misinformation out there. Even convincing one other artist friend they should form an opinion can have an exponential effect.
And just as important are the arts institutions. Schools, colleges and Universities professional orginizations and companies who have a vested interest in maintaining a robust freelance creative community.
Contact your alma matter, your alumni groups, SCBWI. Ask them what specifically they are doing about this issue.
Fun fact: SCBWI receives (conservatively) tens of thousands of dollars in "Reprographic Royalties" (google it or let me know if you'd like me post more details). These funds are given with the very specific intention of bettering the entire picture book community, regardless of whether you are an SCBWI member or not. I know I'd like to see SCBWI spearheading an effort to correct how Ai companies have harmed the artistic community.
-
@davidhohn I didn't know that about SCBWI. They have been pretty quiet on the matter so far. I am a member, so I will definitely contact them. And I would be interested in learning more about these "Reprographic royalties." And posting them here would make sure anyone else on this thread has access too.
-
Do any Australians here know what the creative industry in Australia is doing to push back? It's clearly a global issue but I'd be interested if someone knows more about what's happening in Australia and which groups are doing what.
I'll try and find out.
-
@davidhohn Wilful without a doubt. They would know exactly what they were doing.
-
@kirsten-mcg I was particularly grumpy when I wrote that first post ha. Something to do with my toddler forgetting how to sleep for more than 2 hours at a time!
-
@danielerossi some good points mate. I guess it's either incorporate new tech into your workflow or go really analogue in response to it. I'm probably the latter.
-
@MarcRobinson I had a discussion with another illustrator who had a similar "I'm going to shift to physical media" response to the AI art issue.
Genuinely curious -- how would this solve the issue for you?
Note: I am 100% in favor of physical media! (also in favor of digital media)
-
@davidhohn I've not got much of a plan. I tend to draw my stuff traditionally then paint over in Photoshop. I'm probably going to keep with this as it is important to my style. However if things go the way I fear (digital art becoming a complete noisy landscape of AI mess) I may have to try selling work in a more fine art way. Or if its for books, make a big deal of how I use traditional methods as part of the process? I'm not sure. It's all very confusing.
-
@MarcRobinson haha I know what that's like! No worries. I think it's important to share our raw feelings too. Sometimes it helps just to get it out. I was at my parents house yesterday and broke down and bawled my eyes out while I told them all of this. They didn't have any solutions for me, but it helped just to say it all and not keep it inside.
I've had similar thoughts about traditional media. I've felt myself drawn more to pencil and paper lately. When I post reels on Instagram it's the ones where I'm working in traditional watercolor that tend to get the most views. I think people will always be fascinated/drawn to people who can do art with physical media. It's something computers can't do...at least not yet.
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kirsten.mcgonigal.art/
Portfolio Site: www.kirstenmcgonigalart.com -
@kirsten-mcg I've seen your watercolour reels on IG, they're really good! I'm not surprised they get the most traction. My 9 yr old son asks me often "what should I do when I grow up?". How can anyone answer that when who knows what jobs will even be left? Anyway, guess all we can do is keep on keeping on.
-
@MarcRobinson I run into that problem with my kids too. I have a 12 year old son who is so good at drawing already and loves it. I can see him being really happy in a creative career. I just hope that option is left to him by the time he's an adult.
-
@kirsten-mcg I've experienced the same thing on IG; as AI art is becoming more pervasive, the response to the traditional part of my process has exploded. Anything reels showing literal brush, paint, or ink going onto physical media gets a far bigger response than a completed piece or showing my process steps for a digital piece.
-
I really resonate with what @danielerossi said in this thread. When I started drawing again some 3 or 4 years ago, I was fascinated and obsessed with making "perfect" seeming digital artwork.
This journey taught me the tools I need to bring my traditional art into the computer and make a proper digital copy, but it ultimately informed me that I'm not making art for the sake of spending more time in front of a screen.
I know this is an incredibly unpopular opinion (so please don't cast me out from this group that I love so much haha) but I've felt for some time now that art made digitally would get wrapped up in the increasing abilities of technology.
Between color picking, brush smoothing and the thousands of tools to "regulate" your process of drawing and painting, for me, this isn't art making in it's truest form - it's a technician based usage of a software.
Just as I may use ArcGIS from ESRI to make a map today, you may use Photoshop from Adobe to make your painting. However, making a map with this technology doesn't make me a topographer or a cartographer. It makes me a GIS technician.
I believe the world of digital art has been and continues to draw a line between true artists and art technicians.
Ultimately we've traded traditional difficult-to-master skills for ease and efficiency, because we have to produce, produce, produce and then produce some more for those markets to keep that cash flowing.
The ability to recognize what has been happening and why are paramount to understanding your purpose in creating.
Go ahead and shoot me now for these divisive two cents
-
@Kristen-Lango Glad the stuff that pours from my brain resonates
I think I get what you mean by using software to create art doesn’t make one an artist. However, I respectfully disagree (while still fully allowing you to remain in the group :)). Or at least take it one step further — by that definition, then Will Terry wouldn’t be classified as an artist. I can’t picture calling him an art technician and not an artist. I am always in awe of the skills he has in creating his own pencil textures but also the beautiful illustrations he creates digitally.To me computer and traditional tools are just that tools. Some people create mixed media art, others video art. It’s still art. And with that logic, I can draw a map with coffee
Will it be an accurate, good map to use? Most likely not because I’m not a cartographer.Perhaps AI users can be art technicians
Or would that be collaborative artists? After all, they are using software to put things (a collage?) together. So maybe you are on the right track after all.But I’ve really gone off on a tangent now and maybe I’ve also started splitting hairs (or is that “hares” since this is the SVS forum
). Anyhoo, great discussion and my turn to ask for forgiveness and continued membership in this forum -
@Kristen-Lango and @danielerossi I don't want to cast either of you out of this discussion! I think you've both made some interesting and valid points. I know what Kristen is talking about when it comes to digital art. There comes a point when it doesn't feel much like creation and more like image manipulation, especially when you can trace over reference so easily and re-do and adjust and resize as much as you want. But I, too, would 100% place Will Terry in the "artist" category. Most of what he does takes real artistic skill, not just knowledge of software. And I would guess that if you took away all his digital tools, he could still create phenomenal art. I think things like adjustment layers might lean more toward "technician" though. But for those of us who use digital art in very much the same way we would create traditionally, for me it's still art.
But it will be interesting to see if traditional art makes a comeback in the future. It's something that machines can't do nearly as well as we can...yet. And personally I wouldn't mind if there was more of a demand for traditional art!
-
@Kristen-Lango, @kirsten-mcg I feel the same way about Photoshop. I've spent a lot of time trying to make things look polished, or use a bunch of specialty brushes, lots of adjustment layers, masks, and got kind of burned out on it. So now I'm trying to simplify things and limit brushes, limit layers, and treat it like a simple paint surface. Photoshop is so powerful that it's easy to get into trouble, lol.
Anyway, as far as AI art goes, I wouldn't want it dictating my composition, concepts or characters. But I can see a use for it, like a super tailored google image search for reference AFTER you've sketched out ideas and scenes. And only with art that has willfully been added to a database.
I just think it's BS how these tech companies act like it's an inevitable, unstoppable force of nature. And unapologetically just took peoples artwork without consent and are now trying to monetize it. They didn't do that with the music version of AI. Wonder why? Maybe it's because the music industry is organized and litigious? But in contrast, poor artists are scattered to the winds, have no power and they know this.
